Colvin v. USP Canaan

Plaintiff: James L Colvin
Defendant: Warden U S P Canaan
Case Number: 5:2014cv01017
Filed: May 19, 2014
Court: Louisiana Western District Court
Office: Shreveport Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: S Maurice Hicks
Referring Judge: Mark L Hornsby
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 10, 2015 35 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT ADOPTING 29 Report and Recommendations, IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner's application for writ of habeas corpus be denied and dismissed with prejudice, sua sponte, because it is time barred by the one-year limitation period imposed by the AEDPA. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's motion for summary judgment be DENIED 16 . Signed by Judge Tom Stagg on 2/9/2015. (crt,Joffrion, B)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Colvin v. USP Canaan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James L Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Warden U S P Canaan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?