Jackson et al v. Y R C Inc et al
| Antonio Jackson and Jamario Lougin |
| Y R C Inc and William Dearman |
| 5:2014cv01045 |
| May 27, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Shreveport Office |
| Acadia |
| Karen L Hayes |
| S Maurice Hicks |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
101
MEMORANDUM ORDER granting in part and denying in part 93 Motion to Compel: IT IS ORDERED that the motion to compel discovery responses and Rule 30(b)(6) deposition of defendant, YRC, Inc., and request for costs [doc. # 93] filed by plaintiff Li sa Mallard is GRANTED IN PART. Within the next thirty days (30) days from the date of this order, defendant YRC, Inc., shall produce a corporate representative for deposition regarding the information as detailed in the body of this opinion. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion [doc. # 93], including the request for fees, expenses, and/or costs, otherwise is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Hayes on 6/27/16. (crt,DickersonSld, D)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER granting 29 Motion to Compel DNA Testing. Plaintiffs shall submit to DNA blood testing within twenty-eight (28) days from the Date of this Order to determine Decedents biological relation to Plaintiffs. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Hayes on 12/9/14. (crt,Crawford, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
