Omran v. Prator et al
| Mohamed Admed Hassan Abdallah Omran |
| Steve Prator, Robert Wyche and Dinkins |
| 5:2014cv02825 |
| September 25, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Shreveport Office |
| Caddo |
| Elizabeth E Foote |
| Mark L Hornsby |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
111
JUDGMENT ADOPTING 107 Report and Recommendations; denying 94 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 103 Motion for Hearing; and granting 98 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. All claims against all defendants are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Elizabeth E Foote on 4/27/2017. (crt,Keifer, K)
|
|
Filing
112
ORDER re 101 APPEAL OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE DECISION to District Judge re 96 Order on Motion for Extension filed by Mohammed Ahmed Hassan Abdallah Omran; 81 Order on Motion to Compel, Order on Motion to Amend/Correct, 96 Order on Motion. For the reasons set forth, the Orders of the Magistrate Judge are AFFIRMED. Signed by Judge Elizabeth E Foote on 4/27/2017. (crt,Keifer, K)
|
|
Filing
89
ORDER denying 45 Appeal of Magistrate Judge Decision re 43 Order on Motion to Compel ; denying 55 Appeal of Magistrate Judge Decision re 53 Order on Motion to Compel, ; denying 78 Appeal of Magistrate Judge Decision re 60 Order on Motion to Compel. Signed by Judge Elizabeth E Foote on 2/5/2017. (crt,Haik, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
