Newton v. Prator

Newton v. Prator

Plaintiff:	Cory Scott Newton
Defendant:	Steve Prator
Case Number:	5:2014cv03116
Filed:	October 27, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana
Office:	Shreveport Office
County:	Caddo
Presiding Judge:	Elizabeth E Foote
Presiding Judge:	Mark L Hornsby
Nature of Suit:	Employment
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	Both

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 8, 2016	Filing 71 ORDER: The Court grants leave to the Defendant to file an appropriate dispositive motion consistent with its motion in limine by 4/18/2016. An opposition may be filed within 10 days. Signed by Judge Elizabeth E Foote on 4/8/2016. (crt,Keifer, K)
February 18, 2016	Filing 55 MEMORANDUM RULING granting in part and denying in part 31 Motion for Summary Judgment. As to Defendant's motion for summary judgment on Plaintiffs due process claim, the Defendant's Motion is GRANTED and that claim is DISMISSED with prej udice. As to Defendant's motion for summary judgment on Plaintiff's claim under the Police Officers Bill of Rights, the Defendant's Motion is GRANTED and that claim is DISMISSED with prejudice. As to Plaintiff's claim under Louisi anas whistle blower statute, the Defendant's Motion is GRANTED and that claim is DISMISSED with prejudice. As to Plaintiff's claim under COBRA, the Defendants Motion is DENIED. Signed by Judge Elizabeth E Foote on 2/18/2016. (crt,Keifer, K)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 8, 2016

Filing 71 ORDER: The Court grants leave to the Defendant to file an appropriate dispositive motion consistent with its motion in limine by 4/18/2016. An opposition may be filed within 10 days. Signed by Judge Elizabeth E Foote on 4/8/2016. (crt,Keifer, K)

February 18, 2016

Filing 55 MEMORANDUM RULING granting in part and denying in part 31 Motion for Summary Judgment. As to Defendant's motion for summary judgment on Plaintiffs due process claim, the Defendant's Motion is GRANTED and that claim is DISMISSED with prej udice. As to Defendant's motion for summary judgment on Plaintiff's claim under the Police Officers Bill of Rights, the Defendant's Motion is GRANTED and that claim is DISMISSED with prejudice. As to Plaintiff's claim under Louisi anas whistle blower statute, the Defendant's Motion is GRANTED and that claim is DISMISSED with prejudice. As to Plaintiff's claim under COBRA, the Defendants Motion is DENIED. Signed by Judge Elizabeth E Foote on 2/18/2016. (crt,Keifer, K)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Newton v. Prator
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cory Scott Newton
Represented By:	Fred H Sutherland
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Steve Prator
Represented By:	Edwin H Byrd, III
Represented By:	Graham H Todd
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?