Nguyen v. Whittington

Plaintiff: Duke Thomas Nguyen
Defendant: Julian Whittington
Case Number: 5:2015cv00627
Filed: March 16, 2015
Court: Louisiana Western District Court
Office: Shreveport Office
County: Bossier
Referring Judge: Karen L Hayes
Presiding Judge: Tom Stagg
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 6, 2015 6 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT ADOPTING 2 Report and Recommendations, IT IS ORDERED that petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 be DENIED AND DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failing to state a claim for which habeas corpus relief may be granted. Signed by Judge Tom Stagg on 5/5/2015. (crt,Joffrion, B)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nguyen v. Whittington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Duke Thomas Nguyen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Julian Whittington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?