Moton v. David Wade Correctional Center

Plaintiff: Henry Larry Moton
Defendant: Warden David Wade Correctional Center
Case Number: 5:2015cv00631
Filed: March 13, 2015
Court: Louisiana Western District Court
Office: Shreveport Office
County: Claiborne
Presiding Judge: S Maurice Hicks
Referring Judge: Mark L Hornsby
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 23, 2016 10 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT ADOPTING 9 Report and Recommendations, dismissing without prejudice 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Henry Larry Moton, for failure to exhaust state court remedies. Signed by Judge S Maurice Hicks on 08/23/2016. (crt,McDonnell, D)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Moton v. David Wade Correctional Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Henry Larry Moton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Warden David Wade Correctional Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?