Williams v. State of Louisiana et al
| Harris L Williams |
| State of Louisiana, Louisiana Community & Technical College System, Louisiana Board of Regents, Amber Saunders, Charles T Strong, Angie Rymer, Rick Bateman, Jr, Monty Sullivan and Joseph C Rallo |
| 5:2015cv02353 |
| September 10, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Shreveport Office |
| Caddo |
| S Maurice Hicks |
| Mark L Hornsby |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
76
MEMORANDUM RULING re 70 MOTION for Reconsideration re 68 Memorandum Ruling, 69 Judgment filed by Harris L Williams. Signed by Judge S Maurice Hicks on 8/30/2017. (crt,McDonnell, D)
|
|
Filing
68
MEMORANDUM RULING re 28 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by State of Louisiana, Amber Saunders, Louisiana Community & Technical College System, Charles T Strong, Angie Rymer, Joseph C Rallo, Louisiana Board of Regents, 43 MO TION to Strike 34 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion, 41 Exhibit, filed by State of Louisiana, Amber Saunders, Louisiana Community & Technical College System, Charles T Strong, Angie Rymer, Monty Sullivan, Joseph C Rallo, Louisiana Board of Regents, Rick Bateman, Jr, 47 MOTION to Propound Requests for Admissions filed by Harris L Williams,. Signed by Judge S Maurice Hicks on 01/24/2017. (crt,McDonnell, D)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
