Integrico Composites Inc v. Southland Process Group L L C

Plaintiff: IntegriCo Composites Inc
Defendant: Southland Process Group L L C
Case Number: 5:2015cv02788
Filed: December 3, 2015
Court: Louisiana Western District Court
Office: Shreveport Office
County: Webster
Referring Judge: Karen L Hayes
Presiding Judge: S Maurice Hicks
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 21, 2016 36 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER re 34 Report and Recommendations, that the 8 Motion to Dismiss and the renewed 33 Motion to Dismiss are hereby DENIED. Signed by Judge S Maurice Hicks on 9/21/2016. (crt,FinnSld, P)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Integrico Composites Inc v. Southland Process Group L L C
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: IntegriCo Composites Inc
Represented By: Glenn L Langley
Represented By: Julianna Petchak Parks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Southland Process Group L L C
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?