Lucas v. Goodwin et al
| Lee Lucas |
| Jerry Goodwin, Judd Moore, Paula Millwee, Robert Rachal, Rahman Singh and James LeBlanc |
| 5:2016cv00425 |
| March 29, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Shreveport Office |
| Claiborne |
| Elizabeth E Foote |
| Karen L Hayes |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
101
JUDGMENT adopting 88 Report and Recommendations; denying 85 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. Signed by Judge Elizabeth E Foote on 11/19/2020. (crt,Keifer, K)
|
|
Filing
48
MEMORANDUM RULING adopting in part and rejecting in part 47 Report and Recommendations; denying 26 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 38 Motion for Summary Judgment; and granting in part and denying in part 40 Motion for Summary Judgme nt. IT IS ORDERED that all claims against Moore and LeBlanc are dismissed with prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED that all claims for monetary damages against Defendants in the official capacities are dismissed without prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED that the claims for injunctive relief against Goodwin, Rachal, and Willee are dismissed without prejudice as moot. Signed by Judge Elizabeth E Foote on 3/7/2018. (crt,Keifer, K)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER denying 15 Motion to Dismiss; adopting 21 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Elizabeth E Foote on 6/27/2017. (crt,ThomasSld, T)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
