Prevo v Teat

Plaintiff: ShaRunda Lynette Prevo
Defendant: Jimmy Teat
Case Number: 5:2016cv01175
Filed: August 12, 2016
Court: Louisiana Western District Court
Office: Shreveport Office
County: Webster
Referring Judge: Karen L Hayes
Presiding Judge: S Maurice Hicks
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 18, 2016 4 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 1 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Plaintiff is ordered to serve the Defendant with the Civil Action Complaint and Request for Expedited Injunctive Relief (Record Document 1); and to file proof of such service in the record. Once the Defendant has appeared, the Court will take up further proceedings. Signed by Judge S Maurice Hicks on 08/18/2016. (crt,Thomas, T)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Prevo v Teat
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ShaRunda Lynette Prevo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jimmy Teat
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?