Yor Wic Construction Co Inc v. Engineering Design Technologies Inc
| Yor-Wic Construction Co Inc |
| Engineering Design Technologies Inc |
| Engineering Design Technologies Inc |
| Yor-Wic Construction Co Inc |
| 5:2017cv00224 |
| February 1, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Shreveport Office |
| Bossier |
| Karen L Hayes |
| S Maurice Hicks |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
126
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 97 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 98 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 100 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying 101 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge S Maurice Hicks, Jr on 7/13/2020. (crt,McDonnell, D)
|
|
Filing
83
MEMORANDUM RULING granting 59 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Fidelity & Deposit Co of Maryland. Signed by Chief Judge S Maurice Hicks, Jr on 3/28/2019. (crt,Keifer, K)
|
|
Filing
73
MEMORANDUM RULING re 30 MOTION to Dismiss For Failure to State a Claim In Original and Amended Petition filed by Engineering Design Technologies Inc. Signed by Chief Judge S Maurice Hicks, Jr on 7/11/2018. (crt,McDonnell, D)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER ; denying 10 Motion to Remand; adopting Report and Recommendations re 24 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge S Maurice Hicks on 8/9/2017. (crt,Keller, J)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
