Eagle Water L L C v. Arch Insurance Co et al
Eagle Water L L C |
Gene Ash, Nida Ash and Arch Insurance Co |
5:2017cv00250 |
February 8, 2017 |
US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
Shreveport Office |
Bossier |
Elizabeth E Foote |
Mark L Hornsby |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 55 MEMORANDUM RULING granting 30 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Arch Insurance Co. Signed by Judge Elizabeth E Foote on 12/28/2018. (crt,Keifer, K) |
Filing 23 ORDER ADOPTING 18 Report and Recommendations; denying 12 Motion to Remand. All claims against Gene Ash and Nida Ash are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Elizabeth E Foote on 6/15/2017. (crt,Keifer, K) |
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM ORDER. If Eagle contests the assertion that the Ashes were improperly joined, it must file a motion to remand, supported by a memorandum, by March 17, 2017 and explain why there is a reasonable basis to predict that state law would allow Eagle to recover against the Ashes. If Eagle timely files a motion to remand, it will be noticed for briefing so that Arch can respond and attempt to meet its burden on the improper joinder issue. If Eagle does not timely file a motion to re mand and challenge the improper joinder plea, the court will consider Eagle to concede the point, the Ashes will be dismissed, and the case will proceed toward a Scheduling Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 02/10/2017. (crt,Crick, S) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.