Speir v. Wiggins
Plaintiff: Christopher Ren Speir
Defendant: Joey Wiggins
Case Number: 5:2017cv00266
Filed: February 13, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana
Office: Shreveport Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Elizabeth E Foote
Presiding Judge: Mark L Hornsby
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 15, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 JUDGMENT adopting 7 Report and Recommendations re 3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Christopher Ren Speir. IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner's complaint is dismissed without prejudice, for failure to prosecute, pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Judge Eldon E Fallon on 8/15/2018. (crt,Keifer, K)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Speir v. Wiggins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher Ren Speir
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joey Wiggins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?