Ardison v. Caddo-Shreveport Street Level Interdiction Unit et al
| Roosevelt Thomas Ardison |
| Caddo-Shreveport Street Level Interdiction Unit, D Belanger and Witham |
| 5:2018cv00636 |
| May 11, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Shreveport Office |
| Caddo |
| Mark L Hornsby |
| S Maurice Hicks |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
JUDGMENT adopting 30 Report and Recommendations, granting 26 Motion for Summary Judgment, granting 27 Motion for Summary Judgment. All remaining claims against Donald Belanger Jr and John Witham are dismissed with prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED that all claims against the Caddo-Shreveport Street Level Interdiction Unit are dismissed sua sponte on the grounds that it is not a legal entity with the capacity to be sued. Signed by Chief Judge S Maurice Hicks, Jr on 3/31/2022. (crt,McDonnell, D)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER adopting 13 Report and Recommendations, dismissing Plaintiff's civil rights claims seeking monetary damages as frivolous under 28 USC Sec 1915(e) until such time as the Heck conditions are met. FURTHER ORDERED that this action insofar as it seeks his immediate release be dismissed for failing to state a claim for which relief may be granted pursuant to Section 1983. Plaintiff's claims regarding excessive force remain pending. Signed by Chief Judge S Maurice Hicks, Jr on 7/12/2021. (crt,McDonnell, D)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
