Morris v. Canal Insurance Co et al
Marvlous M Morris |
Canal Insurance Co and Marquez Trucking Inc |
5:2018cv00974 |
July 26, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
Shreveport Office |
Caddo |
S Maurice Hicks |
Mark L Hornsby |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Canal Insurance Company, Marquez Trucking, Inc.(aty,Hayes, Thomas) |
Filing 3 PROPOSED REMOVAL ORDER referred to Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby. (Public entry, but no electronic notice). (crt,Thigpen, M) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Corporate Disclosure Statement Requirement re: #1 Notice of Removal, sent to Thomas Moore Hayes, IV on behalf of Canal Insurance Company, Marquez Trucking, Inc.. Corporate Disclosure Statement due by 8/9/2018. (crt,Thigpen, M) |
Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from 1st JDC Caddo Parish, Case Number 609149-C (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0536-3712498) filed by Marquez Trucking, Inc., Canal Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet, #2 Exhibit)(Attorney Thomas Moore Hayes, IV added to party Canal Insurance Company(pty:dft), Attorney Thomas Moore Hayes, IV added to party Marquez Trucking, Inc.(pty:dft))(aty,Hayes, Thomas) |
CASE Assigned to Chief Judge S Maurice Hicks, Jr and Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby. (crt,Thigpen, M) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.