Ceasar v. Veterans Administration et al
**Sanctioned/Barred* R Ceasar |
Veterans Administration, Peter Dancy and V A M C |
5:2018cv01067 |
August 17, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
S Maurice Hicks |
Mark L Hornsby |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 FEE LETTER requesting payment of appeal filing fee sent to R Ceasar re #13 Notice of Appeal. (Attachments: #1 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis)(crt,WalkerSld, B) |
Filing 14 FEE LETTER requesting payment of appeal filing fee sent to R Ceasar re #12 Notice of Appeal. (Attachments: #1 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis)(crt,WalkerSld, B) |
Filing 13 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #11 Order by R Ceasar. FEE STATUS: NOT PAID (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(crt,WalkerSld, B) |
Filing 12 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #9 Order on Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis by R Ceasar. FEE STATUS: NOT PAID (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(crt,WalkerSld, B) |
Filing 11 ORDER striking #1 Complaint from the record and closing case as Plaintiff has filed to pay filing fees and costs. Signed by Chief Judge S Maurice Hicks, Jr on 10/2/2018. (crt,McDonnell, D) |
Filing 10 PROPOSED ORDER re #4 Memorandum Order, #1 Complaint referred to Chief Judge S Maurice Hicks Jr. (Public entry, but no electronic notice.) (crt,Mitchell, Pam) |
Filing 9 ORDER denying #7 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Chief Judge S Maurice Hicks, Jr on 9/27/2018. (crt,WalkerSld, B) |
Filing 8 PROPOSED ORDER re #7 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis on Appeal referred to Chief Judge S Maurice Hicks Jr. (Public entry, but no electronic notice). (crt,WalkerSld, B) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis on Appeal by R Ceasar. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(crt,WalkerSld, B) |
Motions Transferred regarding #7 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis on Appeal. Motions referred to Chief Judge S Maurice Hicks, Jr. (crt,WalkerSld, B) |
USCA Case Number 18-31016 for #5 Notice of Appeal filed by R Ceasar. (crt,WalkerSld, B) |
Filing 6 FEE LETTER requesting payment of appeal filing fee sent to R Ceasar re #5 Notice of Appeal. (Attachments: #1 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis)(crt,WalkerSld, B) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #4 Memorandum Order, by R Ceasar. FEE STATUS: NOT PAID (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(crt,WalkerSld, B) |
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM ORDER: Plaintiff is ordered to pay fees and costs owed in suit 6:04-cv-00391 totaling $14,498.62 as well as the filing fees of $400.00 in this case within 30 days. Failure to pay will result in the complaint being stricken from the record and this case closed. Signed by Chief Judge S Maurice Hicks, Jr on 8/23/2018. (crt,McDonnell, D) |
Filing 3 PROPOSED MEMORANDUM ORDER re #1 Complaint referred to Chief Judge S Maurice Hicks Jr. (Public entry, but no electronic notice). (crt,Mitchell, Pam) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Recuse Judge, MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by R Ceasar. (Attachments: #1 Proposed order, #2 Envelope)(crt,Miletello, A) |
Filing 1 STRICKEN - COMPLAINT against Peter Dancy, V A M C, Veterans Administration with Jury Demand filed by R Ceasar. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet, #2 Proposed summons/writ, #3 Letter, #4 Envelope)(crt,Miletello, A) Modified on to reflect stricken 10/2/2018 (Bunting, M). See Order #11 . |
CASE Assigned to Chief Judge S Maurice Hicks, Jr and Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby. (crt,Thigpen, M) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.