Simpkins v. Baluna
Lakisha N Simpkins |
Roxanna Baluna and USA |
5:2018cv01540 |
November 26, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
Elizabeth E Foote |
Mark L Hornsby |
Labor: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Amended Notice of Removal re #1 Notice of Removal by Roxanna Baluna, USA. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Declaration)(aty,Walker, Cristina) Modified on 12/18/2018 to modify docket text. (Crick, S). |
Filing 3 REMOVAL ORDER regarding state court documents, pending motions, registry funds, and admission status of counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 11/29/2018. (crt,Crick, S) Modified on 12/7/2018 to add link (Dunford, T). |
Filing 2 PROPOSED REMOVAL ORDER referred to Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby. (Public entry, but no electronic notice). (crt,Mitchell, P) |
CASE Assigned to Judge Elizabeth E Foote and Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby. (crt,Mitchell, P) |
Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from 1st JDC Caddo Parish, Case Number 611791-A (Filed on behalf of USA - Filing Fee not required) filed by Roxanna Baluna. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil cover sheet)(Attorney Cristina Walker added to party Roxanna Baluna(pty:dft))(aty,Walker, Cristina) (Attachment 3 replaced on 11/27/2018) (Thigpen, M). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.