Cash v. Midland Credit Management Inc et al
Artis Cash |
John Does, Midland Funding L L C and Midland Credit Management Inc |
5:2019cv00081 |
January 23, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
Mark L Hornsby |
Donald E Walter |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 ELECTRONIC JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW FINDING: Having reviewed the pleadings, and any amended pleadings, the court finds that subject matter jurisdiction exists pursuant to: 28 U.S.C. section 1331. This finding is preliminary and may be reconsidered sua sponte or on appropriate motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 1/24/2019. (crt,Stephens, M) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Midland Credit Management Inc, Midland Funding L L C (crt,Crick, S) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Midland Credit Management Inc, Midland Funding L L C, John Does 1-25 with Jury Demand (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0536-3857378) filed by Artis Cash. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil cover sheet, #3 Proposed summons/writ, #4 Proposed summons/writ)(Attorney Samuel John Ford added to party Artis Cash(pty:pla))(aty,Ford, Samuel) Modified on 1/23/2019 to modify docket text. (Crick, S). |
CASE Assigned to Judge Donald E Walter and Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby. (crt,Crick, S) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.