Parish of DeSoto v. Purdue Pharma L P et al
| Desoto Parish and Parish of DeSoto |
| Teva Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc, Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc, Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc, Mallinckrodt P L C, Allergan Finance L L C, Cephalon Inc, Endo Health Solutions Inc, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc, McKesson Corp, Insys Therapeutics Inc, AmerisourceBergen Drug Corp, Allergan P L C, Purdue Pharma Inc, Watson Laboratories Inc, Johnson & Johnson, Purdue Pharma L P, Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc, Actavis L L C, Noramco Inc, Cardinal Health Inc, Mallinckrodt L L C, Actavis Pharma Inc, Purdue Frederick Co Inc and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd |
| 5:2019cv00153 |
| February 6, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| S Maurice Hicks |
| Mark L Hornsby |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| DISTRICT COURT TRANSFER Record Received electronically by Northern District of Ohio on 2/26/2019, assigned case number 1:19-op-45090. (crt,Whidden, C) |
Filing 4
ORDER FOR MULTI-DISTRICT LITIGATION TRANSFER CTO # 80, directing transfer to Northern District of Ohio, In Re: National Prescription Opiate Litigation, MDL # 2804. Record electronically transmitted to receiving court. Case Terminated. All future pleadings should be filed with the newly assigned court. (crt,Whidden, C)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE received via email from Clerk of Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation transmitting Conditional Transfer Order (CTO-80) in MDL No.2804, IN RE: National Prescription Opiate Litigation advising case shall be transferred to the Northern District of Ohio upon request of the record. (crt,Reeves, T) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Actavis L L C, Actavis Pharma Inc, Allergan Finance L L C, Allergan P L C, AmerisourceBergen Drug Corp, Cardinal Health Inc, Cephalon Inc, Endo Health Solutions Inc, Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc, Insys Therapeutics Inc, Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc, Johnson & Johnson, Mallinckrodt L L C, Mallinckrodt P L C, McKesson Corp, Noramco Inc, Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc, Purdue Frederick Co Inc, Purdue Pharma Inc, Purdue Pharma L P, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd, Teva Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc, Watson Laboratories Inc. (crt,Dauterive, C) |
| CASE Assigned to Chief Judge S Maurice Hicks, Jr and Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby. (crt,Dauterive, C) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Actavis L L C, Actavis Pharma Inc, Allergan Finance L L C, Allergan P L C, AmerisourceBergen Drug Corp, Cardinal Health Inc, Cephalon Inc, Endo Health Solutions Inc, Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc, Insys Therapeutics Inc, Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc, Johnson & Johnson, Mallinckrodt L L C, Mallinckrodt P L C, McKesson Corp, Noramco Inc, Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc, Purdue Frederick Co Inc, Purdue Pharma Inc, Purdue Pharma L P, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd, Teva Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc, Watson Laboratories Inc with Jury Demand (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0536-3870801) filed by Desoto Parish. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet, #2 Civil cover sheet Counsel for Plaintiff, #3 Civil cover sheet List of Defendants)(Attorney Ralph R Alexis, III added to party Desoto Parish(pty:pla))(aty,Alexis, Ralph) Modified on 2/7/2019 to edit text (Dauterive, C). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
