Dixon v. Louisiana et al
| Concita D Dixon |
| State of Louisiana and Parish of Caddo |
| 5:2019cv01002 |
| July 31, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| S Maurice Hicks |
| Mark L Hornsby |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 EXHIBITS re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Concita D Dixon. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(crt,Haik, K) |
| FILING FEE RECEIVED: on behalf of Concita D Dixon in the amount of $5.00, receipt number 54635062245. (crt,Reasor, M) |
Filing 3
MEMORANDUM ORDER: Plaintiff failed to submit documents on approved forms.Plaintiff failed to submit filing fee or a completed IFP application. Pro Se Deadline to comply with deficiency set for 9/3/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 8/2/2019. (Attachments: #1 In forma pauperis form, #2 Habeas form)(crt,Williams, L)
|
| Filing 2 PROPOSED MEMORANDUM ORDER referred to Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby. (Public entry, but no electronic notice). (crt,Thigpen, M) |
| Filing 1 DEFICIENT PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus entitled "Motion to Continue" filed by Concita D Dixon. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet, #2 Envelope)(crt,Miletello, A). Complaint not on approved forms. |
| CASE Assigned to Chief Judge S Maurice Hicks, Jr and Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby. (crt,Thigpen, M) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
