Price v. International Paper Company
| John Price |
| International Paper Company and International Paper Co |
| 5:2019cv01362 |
| October 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Terry A Doughty |
| Mark L Hornsby |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by John Price. International Paper Co waiver sent on 10/22/2019, answer due 12/23/2019. (aty,Jones, Allison) |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW FINDING: Having reviewed the pleadings, and any amended pleadings, the court finds that subject matter jurisdiction exists pursuant to: 28 U.S.C. section 1331. This finding is preliminary and may be reconsidered sua sponte or on appropriate motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 10/21/2019. (crt,Rider, M) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to International Paper Co (crt,Williams, L) |
| CASE Assigned to Judge Terry A Doughty and Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby. (crt,Williams, L) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against International Paper Company with Jury Demand (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0536-4077378) filed by John Price. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet)(Attorney Allison Anne Jones added to party John Price(pty:pla))(aty,Jones, Allison) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
