Ford v. Goodwin
| Eddie Ray Ford |
| Jerry Goodwin |
| 5:2019cv01428 |
| November 1, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| S Maurice Hicks |
| Joseph H L Perez-Montes |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| FILING FEE RECEIVED: on behalf of Eddie Ray Ford in the amount of $5, receipt number 64635007967. (crt,Devillier, W) |
| NOTICE of Correction of Prisoner ID Number. Prisoner ID number corrected from 86167 to 88167. Clerk resent docs. 3 & #4 on 12/2/19. (crt,Haik, K) |
| Filing 6 MAIL RETURNED as Undeliverable: Mail sent to Eddie Ray Ford, David Wade Correctional Center, re: #4 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis returned marked: return to sender, no inmate number. (crt,Haik, K) |
| Filing 5 MAIL RETURNED as Undeliverable: Mail sent to Eddie Ray Ford, David Wade Correctional Center, re: 3 Jurisdictional Review Finding, returned marked: return to sender, no inmate number. (crt,Haik, K) |
| NOTICE of Corrective Action regarding #4 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Action taken: Incorrect order action selected and docket entry modified to properly reflect correct order action as "denying". (crt,Haik, K) |
Filing 4
MEMORANDUM ORDER denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes on 11/5/2019. (crt,Williams, L) Modified to correct docket entry text on 12/2/2019 (Haik, K).
|
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW FINDING: Having reviewed the pleadings, and any amended pleadings, the court finds that subject matter jurisdiction exists pursuant to: 28 U.S.C. section 1331. This finding is preliminary and may be reconsidered sua sponte or on appropriate motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes on 11/5/2019. (jud,Perez-Montes, Joseph) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Eddie Ray Ford. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(crt,Miletello, A) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/4/2019: #2 Proposed order) (Thigpen, M). |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Eddie Ray Ford. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet, #2 Envelope)(crt,Miletello, A) Modified on 11/4/2019 to correct filing date (Miletello, A). |
| CASE Assigned to Chief Judge S Maurice Hicks, Jr and Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Joseph H L Perez-Montes. (crt,Thigpen, M) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ford v. Goodwin | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Jerry Goodwin | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Eddie Ray Ford | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
