Shelton v. Parish of DeSoto
| Amy Shelton |
| Parish of DeSoto |
| 5:2019cv01561 |
| December 6, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| S Maurice Hicks |
| Mark L Hornsby |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #4 MOTION to Dismiss For Failure to State a Claim DeSoto Parish Police Jury. Responses due by 2/27/2020. Replies due by 3/5/2020. Signed by Chief Judge S Maurice Hicks, Jr on 2/3/2019. (crt,Jones, P)
|
| Motions Transferred regarding #6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to #4 MOTION to Dismiss For Failure to State a Claim DeSoto Parish Police Jury with consent . Motions referred to Chief Judge S Maurice Hicks, Jr. (crt,Crick, S) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to #4 MOTION to Dismiss For Failure to State a Claim DeSoto Parish Police Jury with consent by Amy Shelton. Motions referred to Mark L Hornsby. (Attachments: #1 Proposed order)(aty,Jones, Allison) Modified on 1/29/2020 to modify docket text. (Crick, S). |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Motion Setting regarding: #4 MOTION to Dismiss For Failure to State a Claim DeSoto Parish Police Jury. Motions referred to Chief Judge S Maurice Hicks, Jr. (crt,Crick, S) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss For Failure to State a Claim DeSoto Parish Police Jury by Parish of DeSoto. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum / Brief, #2 Proposed order)(Attorney Edwin H Byrd, III added to party Parish of DeSoto(pty:dft))(aty,Byrd, Edwin) |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW FINDING: Having reviewed the pleadings, and any amended pleadings, the court finds that subject matter jurisdiction exists pursuant to: 28 U.S.C. section 1331. This finding is preliminary and may be reconsidered sua sponte or on appropriate motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 12/9/2019. (crt,Rider, M) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Parish of DeSoto (crt,Crick, S) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Parish of DeSoto with Jury Demand (Filing fee $400, receipt number ALAWDC-4126753) filed by Amy Shelton. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet)(Attorney Allison Anne Jones added to party Amy Shelton(pty:pla))(aty,Jones, Allison) |
| CASE Assigned to Chief Judge S Maurice Hicks, Jr and Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby. (crt,Crick, S) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Shelton v. Parish of DeSoto | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Parish of DeSoto | |
| Represented By: | Edwin H Byrd, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Amy Shelton | |
| Represented By: | Allison Anne Jones |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
