Sorenson v. Lawrence et al
| James Sorenson |
| District Attorney Bossier City and Marita Lawrence |
| 5:2020cv00176 |
| February 7, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| S Maurice Hicks |
| Mark L Hornsby |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 RESPONSE by James Sorenson re #2 MEMORANDUM ORDER. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Envelope)(crt,Haik, K) |
Filing 2
MEMORANDUM ORDER: Directing plaintiff to provide a copy of the legal memorandum filed at each level of the state courts and all responses received, and submit a response setting forth allegations which demonstrate that the petition is timely. Pro Se Response due by 3/13/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 2/12/2020. (crt,Chicola, C)
|
| FILING FEE RECEIVED: on behalf of James Sorenson in the amount of $5, receipt number 54635063429. (crt,Chavis, J) |
| DIVISIONAL TRANSFER of Old Case Number 3:20-cv-0176 from Monroe Division to Shreveport Division. New Case Number 5:20-cv-0176. Case assigned to Chief Judge S Maurice Hicks, Jr and Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby. (crt,Williams, L) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Receipt number 54635063429, filing fee $5) filed by James Sorenson. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Envelope)(crt,Chavis, J) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
