Robinson v. Marel Inc et al
Christy Robinson |
Marel Inc., Unknown Defendants, Marel Inc and X Y Z Insurance Co |
5:2020cv00251 |
February 25, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
Mark L Hornsby |
Donald E Walter |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 MEMORANDUM ORDER: All requirements of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(f) are hereby waived in this case, including the conference of the parties and the report to the Court. The parties are directed to serve their initial disclosures within 30 days and promptly begin any necessary discovery and motion practice. A scheduling order will be issued by the Court setting the matter for trial in due course. Signed by Judge Donald E Walter on 3/11/2020. (crt,Bray, K) |
Filing 9 ELECTRONIC MINUTE ENTRY: The scheduling conference set for April 22, 2020 is cancelled. The parties may disregard the deadlines set in Doc. #8 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 3/9/2020. (crt,Rider, M) |
Filing 8 ORDER: Scheduling Conference set for 4/22/2020 10:30 AM in chambers before Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby. Rule 26 Conference between parties to take place before 4/8/2020. Initial Disclosures exchanged by 4/15/2020. Rule 26 Report due by 4/15/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 3/4/2020. (crt,Keller, J) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Marel Inc.(aty,Rosenzweig, Ira) |
Filing 6 REMOVAL ORDER regarding state court documents, pending motions, registry funds, and admission status of counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 2/27/2020. (crt,Crick, S) |
Filing 5 ELECTRONIC JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW FINDING: Having reviewed the pleadings, and any amended pleadings, the court finds that subject matter jurisdiction exists pursuant to: 28 U.S.C. section 1332. This finding is preliminary and may be reconsidered sua sponte or on appropriate motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 2/27/2020. (crt,Rider, M) |
Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Marel Inc identifying Corporate Parent Marel U S A Holding Inc for Marel Inc. (aty,Rosenzweig, Ira) Modified on 2/26/2020 to modify docket text. (Crick, S). |
Filing 3 PROPOSED REMOVAL ORDER Referred to Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby. (Public entry, but no electronic notice). (crt,Thigpen, M) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Corporate Disclosure Statement Requirement re: #1 Notice of Removal, sent to Ira J Rosenzweig on behalf of Marel Inc. Corporate Disclosure Statement due by 3/11/2020. (crt,Thigpen, M) |
STATE COURT Service Returned Executed. Marel Inc answer due 3/3/2020. ADMINISTRATIVE ENTRY: (THE PDF IMAGE CAN BE FOUND IN ATTACHMENT #2 OF DOCUMENT #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL). (crt,Thigpen, M) |
CASE Assigned to Judge Donald E Walter and Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby. (crt,Thigpen, M) |
Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from 2nd JDC Bienville Parish, Case Number 45-394 (Filing fee $400, receipt number ALAWDC-4192236) filed by Marel Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Petition for Damages, #2 Exhibit B-State Court Record, #3 Exhibit C-State Court Notice of Removal, #4 Exhibit D-Westlaw PeopleMap-Plaintiff, #5 Exhibit E-Kansas Business Entity Search, #6 Exhibit F-Zurich Detail Entity, #7 Exhibit G-Declaration, #8 Civil cover sheet)(Attorney Ira J Rosenzweig added to party Marel Inc.(pty:dft))(aty,Rosenzweig, Ira) (Attachment 8 replaced on 2/26/2020) (Thigpen, M). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.