International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 194 et al v. Trio Electric Company Inc
Shreveport Joint Apprenticeship & Training Fund, Shreveport Electrical Health & Welfare Fund, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 194 and Shreveport Electrical Industry Profit Sharing Plan |
Trio Electric Company, Inc. |
5:2020cv00519 |
April 24, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Trio Electric Company, Inc. (Filing fee $400, receipt number ALAWDC-4245512) filed by Shreveport Joint Apprenticeship & Training Fund, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 194, Shreveport Electrical Industry Profit Sharing Plan, Shreveport Electrical Health & Welfare Fund. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet, #2 Proposed summons/writ)(Attorney Laura Kathleen Cline added to party International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 194(pty:pla), Attorney Laura Kathleen Cline added to party Shreveport Electrical Health & Welfare Fund(pty:pla), Attorney Laura Kathleen Cline added to party Shreveport Electrical Industry Profit Sharing Plan(pty:pla), Attorney Laura Kathleen Cline added to party Shreveport Joint Apprenticeship & Training Fund(pty:pla))(aty,Cline, Laura) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.