Gaitan et al v. Home Depot U S A Inc
| Agustin Gaitan and Hazel Gaitan |
| Home Depot USA, Inc., John Doe and Home Depot U S A Inc doing business as Home Depot |
| 5:2020cv00719 |
| June 5, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Karen L Hayes |
| S Maurice Hicks |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Motion Setting regarding: #15 MOTION to File First Supplemental & Amending Complaint with opposition. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Karen L Hayes. Responses due by 8/20/2020 (crt,Crick, S) |
| Filing 15 MOTION to File First Supplemental & Amending Complaint with opposition by Agustin Gaitan, Hazel Gaitan. Motions referred to Karen L Hayes. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 7/30/2020. (Attachments: #1 Proposed pleading, #2 Exhibit 1 Petition, #3 Exhibit 2 Letter 06.10.20, #4 Exhibit 3 Discovery requests, #5 Exhibit 4 Letter 09.10.19, #6 Exhibit 5 Letter 11.07.19, #7 Exhibit 6 Affidavit Agustin Gaitan, #8 Exhibit 7 Ruling Campbell, #9 Exhibit 8 Ruling Mitchell, #10 Memorandum / Brief, #11 Proposed order)(aty,Simon, J) Modified on 7/30/2020 to modify motion event and modify docket text. (Crick, S). |
| Filing 14 RESPONSE to Motion re #12 MOTION to Remand Objection to Removal and Motion to Remand filed by Home Depot U S A Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(aty,Caruso, Susan) Modified on 7/28/2020 to modify docket tedxt (Miletello, A). |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Motion Setting regarding: #12 MOTION to Remand Objection to Removal and Motion to Remand. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Karen L Hayes. Responses due by 7/28/2020 (crt,Bunting, M) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Remand Objection to Removal and Motion to Remand by Agustin Gaitan, Hazel Gaitan. Motions referred to Karen L Hayes. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 7/6/2020. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum / Brief, #2 Exhibit 1 Petition, #3 Exhibit 2 Interrogatories, #4 Exhibit 3 Request for Production, #5 Exhibit 4 Letter 06.10.2020, #6 Exhibit 5 Letter 06.15.2020, #7 Exhibit 6 Def Letter 06.15.2020, #8 Exhibit 7 Letter 06.17.2020, #9 Proposed order)(aty,Simon, J) |
Filing 11
ORDER granting #10 Motion to Enroll as Additional Counsel. Kevin R Duck added as counsel for Agustin Gaitan, Hazel Gaitan. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Hayes on 7/6/2020. (crt,Miletello, A)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines as to #10 MOTION to Enroll as Counsel. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 7/2/2020. (crt,Dunford, T) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Enroll as Additional Counsel and to Designate Trial Attorney filed by Agustin Gaitan, Hazel Gaitan. (Attachments: #1 Proposed order)(aty,Duck, Kevin) Modified event to more accurately describe document filed on 7/2/2020 (Bunting, M). |
| Motions Transferred regarding #10 MOTION to Enroll as Counsel. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Karen L Hayes. (crt,Bunting, M) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Deficiency to Kevin R Duck on behalf of Agustin Gaitan, Hazel Gaitan regarding #8 Notice of Appearance,. Reason: This party is already represented by other counsel. Please refer to provisions under LR83.2.12 regarding appearance of other counsel to ensure compliance with this rule. A motion to enroll as co-counsel or to substitute counsel (signed by the current counsel of record) is required to remedy this situation. Please also refer to LR5.7.08 regarding electronic filing of documents requiring signatures of more than one party. (crt,Bunting, M) |
| Filing 8 DOCUMENT RESUBMITTED IN ITS ENTIRETY - NOTICE of Appearance by Kevin R Duck on behalf of Agustin Gaitan, Hazel Gaitan (Attorney Kevin R Duck added to party Agustin Gaitan(pty:pla), Attorney Kevin R Duck added to party Hazel Gaitan(pty:pla)) (aty,Duck, Kevin) (Main Document 8 replaced on 6/29/2020) (Bunting, M). Modified to reflect deficient status on 6/29/2020 (Bunting, M). Modified to reflect resubmitted on 7/2/2020 (Bunting, M). |
| Filing 7 RESPONSE TO REMOVAL ORDER by Home Depot U S A Inc . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Pleadings and Process)(aty,Caruso, Susan) |
| Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Home Depot U S A Inc identifying Corporate Parent Home Depot International, Inc for Home Depot U S A Inc. (aty,Caruso, Susan) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Home Depot U S A Inc.(aty,Caruso, Susan) |
|
Filing 4
REMOVAL ORDER regarding state court documents, pending motions, registry funds, and admission status of counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Hayes on 6/9/2020. (crt,Leday, A)
|
| Filing 3 PROPOSED REMOVAL ORDER Referred to Magistrate Judge Karen L Hayes. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 6/8/2020. (crt,Thigpen, M) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Corporate Disclosure Statement Requirement re: #1 Notice of Removal, sent to Susan Marie Caruso, Milton Davis Ready, Megan Sara Peterson on behalf of Home Depot U S A Inc. Corporate Disclosure Statement due by 6/22/2020. (crt,Thigpen, M) |
| CASE Assigned to Chief Judge S Maurice Hicks, Jr and Magistrate Judge Karen L Hayes. (crt,Thigpen, M) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from 1st JDC Caddo Parish, Case Number 620861 (Filing fee $400, receipt number ALAWDC-4284699) filed by Home Depot USA, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Affidavit, #2 Exhibit State Court Pleadings, #3 Civil cover sheet)(Attorney Susan Marie Caruso added to party Home Depot USA, Inc.(pty:dft))(aty,Caruso, Susan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
