Strange v. Interactive Data Services L L C et al
| Clinton Strange |
| Ryan Patrick Burke and Interactive Data Services L L C |
| 5:2020cv01081 |
| August 17, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| S Maurice Hicks |
| Mark L Hornsby |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 0227 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW FINDING: Having reviewed the pleadings, and any amended pleadings, the court finds that subject matter jurisdiction exists pursuant to: 28 U.S.C. section 1331. This finding is preliminary and may be reconsidered sua sponte or on appropriate motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 8/31/2020. (crt,Rider, M) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Related Litigation Pursuant to L R 3.1 by Clinton Strange indicating SD/FL action 9:19-cv-81675 and WDLA action 5:19-cv-1429 as related. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(crt,Dunford, T) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Ryan Patrick Burke, Interactive Data Services L L C. (crt,Crick, S) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ryan Patrick Burke, Interactive Data Services L L C with Jury Demand (Receipt number 54635064378, filing fee $400) filed by Clinton Strange. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet, #2 Exhibits, #3 Letter, #4 Envelope)(crt,Adams, K) |
| CASE Assigned to Chief Judge S Maurice Hicks, Jr and Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby. (crt,Crick, S) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
