Powell v. Social Security Administration
| Lashonda Powell |
| Social Security Administration |
| 5:2020cv01387 |
| October 26, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| S Maurice Hicks |
| Mark L Hornsby |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1383 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 SEALED DOCUMENT: Notice of Mailing of Complaint for service by Lashonda Powell re #6 Summons Issued - SSA. (crt,Bunting, M) |
Filing 7
MEMORANDUM ORDER: This order is issued to explain to Plaintiff the obligations that must be met to obtain a decision from the court. Once Plaintiff files evidence of service, the Clerk of Court will issue a Scheduling Order and a Deadlines Worksheet. Plaintiff must keep the court informed of a current address. If Plaintiff should have a change in address, Plaintiff must notify the Clerk of Court in writing. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 11/4/2020. (crt,Miletello, A)
|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS ISSUED as to US Attorney, US Attorney General and Comm of Social Security. (crt,Bunting, M) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 11/3/2020. (crt,Bunting, M)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Lashonda Powell. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 11/2/2020. (Attachments: #1 Proposed order)(crt,Bunting, M) |
| Filing 3 LETTER to LaShonda Powell regarding #1 Complaint, filed by Lashonda Powell. (Attachments: #1 IFP Form) (crt,Bunting, M) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Deficiency to Lashonda Powell regarding #1 Complaint. Reason: No filing fee accompanied this complaint. The filing fee for a new civil action is $400.00. Within ten (10) days from the date of this notice you must either pay the required fee or submit a completed Application for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. See 28 USC 1914. (crt,Bunting, M) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Social Security Administration filed by Lashonda Powell. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet, #2 Envelope)(crt,Chavis, J) (Main Document 1 replaced on 10/28/2020) (Bunting, M). (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/28/2020: #3 Exhibit) (Bunting, M). Modified to reflect deficient status on 10/30/2020 (Bunting, M). Modified to remove deficient status on 11/2/2020. See #4 . (Bunting, M). |
| Chief Judge S Maurice Hicks, Jr and Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby added. (crt,Bunting, M) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Powell v. Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Lashonda Powell | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Social Security Administration | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
