Broad v. National Oilwell Varco L P
Jamie Broad |
National Oilwell Varco L P |
5:2022cv00252 |
January 27, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
S Maurice Hicks |
Mark L Hornsby |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against National Oilwell Varco L P filed by Jamie Broad. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-Agreement, #2 Exhibit 2-January 2022 Letter)(aty,Jones, Reid) |
Filing 7 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by National Oilwell Varco L P identifying Corporate Parents NOW Oilfield Varco L L C, National Oilwell Varco Inc, National Oilwell Varco L P; Other Affiliates Grant Prideco Inc, NOW Oilfield Service L L C for National Oilwell Varco L P. (aty,Carmody, Elizabeth) Modified docket text on 3/18/2022 (Miletello, A). |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Motion Setting regarding: #5 MOTION to Compel Arbitration MOTION to Dismiss. Motions referred to Chief Judge S Maurice Hicks, Jr. (crt,Whitener, M) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Compel Arbitration , MOTION to Dismiss by National Oilwell Varco L P. Motions referred to Mark L Hornsby. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 3/16/2022. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum / Brief, #2 Proposed order, #3 Exhibit A)(Attorney Elizabeth M Carmody added to party National Oilwell Varco L P(pty:dft))(aty,Carmody, Elizabeth). Added MOTION to Dismiss on 3/17/2022 (Whitener, M). |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jamie Broad. National Oilwell Varco L P served on 2/25/2022, answer due 3/18/2022. (aty,Jones, Reid) |
Filing 3 ELECTRONIC JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW FINDING: Having reviewed the pleadings, and any amended pleadings, the court finds that subject matter jurisdiction exists pursuant to: 28 U.S.C. section 1332. This finding is preliminary and may be reconsidered sua sponte or on appropriate motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 2/3/2022. (crt,Rider, M) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to National Oilwell Varco L P. (crt,Miletello, A) |
CASE Assigned to Chief Judge S Maurice Hicks, Jr and Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby. (crt,Miletello, A) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against National Oilwell Varco L P (Filing fee $402, receipt number ALAWDC-4975836) filed by Jamie Broad. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet, #2 Exhibit 1-Agreement, #3 Exhibit 2-January 2022 Letter)(Attorney Reid Allen Jones added to party Jamie Broad(pty:pla))(aty,Jones, Reid) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Broad v. National Oilwell Varco L P | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Jamie Broad | |
Represented By: | Reid Allen Jones |
Represented By: | Marjorie L Frazier |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: National Oilwell Varco L P | |
Represented By: | Elizabeth M Carmody |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.