Smith v. Farris et al
| Cardrick Smith |
| CDR Farris, Meditcal and Commander Farris |
| 5:2022cv00430 |
| February 10, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| S Maurice Hicks |
| Mark L Hornsby |
| Prisoner Petitions: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
MEMORANDUM ORDER: Plaintiff failed to submit filing fee or a completed IFP application. ( Pro Se Deadline to comply with deficiency set for 3/18/2022). Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 2/15/2022. (Attachments: #1 ifp form)(crt,Haik, K)
|
| Filing 2 PROPOSED MEMORANDUM ORDER Referred to Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 2/14/2022. (crt,Devillier, W) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Cardrick Smith. ADMINISTRATIVE ENTRY to capture motion relief requested within pdf of Doc 1 Complaint. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 2/10/2022. (crt,Devillier, W) Modified to assign document number on 2/14/2022 (Devillier, W). |
| CASE Assigned to Chief Judge S Maurice Hicks, Jr and Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby. (crt,Devillier, W) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Farris, Meditcal filed by Cardrick Smith. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet, #2 Envelope)(crt,Chavis, J) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
