Hunter v. Murphy Oil USA Inc et al
Plaintiff: Elnora Hunter
Defendant: Murphy Oil USA, Inc., Murphy Oil U S A Inc and Hartford doing business as Twin City Fire Insurance Co
Case Number: 5:2022cv00485
Filed: February 17, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana
Presiding Judge: Elizabeth E Foote
Referring Judge: Kayla D McClusky
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 13, 2022 Filing 12 REPLY to Response to Motion re #9 Motion to Remand, filed by Elnora Hunter. (aty,Davis, S) Modified to correct docket entry relationship on 4/14/2022 (Thomas, T).
April 6, 2022 Filing 11 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #9 Motion to Remand filed by Murphy Oil U S A Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Draft Stipulation)(aty,Kean, Richard)
March 16, 2022 Filing 10 NOTICE of Motion Setting regarding: #9 Motion to Remand. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Kayla D McClusky. Responses due by 4/6/2022. (crt,Thomas, T)
March 16, 2022 Filing 9 MOTION to Remand, styled as Notice of Motion to Remand by Elnora Hunter (aty,Davis, S) Modified to correct event type and indicate Memorandum and Exhibits filed as document #8 on 3/16/2022 (Thomas, T).
March 16, 2022 Filing 8 MEMORANDUM in Support of #9 Motion to Remand, styled as Notice of Motion to Remand by Elnora Hunter. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(aty,Davis, S) Modified to indicate PDF image of motion filed as document #9 and to update docket text to more accurately reflect document filed on 3/16/2022. (Thomas, T).
March 16, 2022 NOTICE of Corrective Action to S P Davis on behalf of Elnora Hunter regarding #9 Notice, #8 Motion to Remand. Action Taken: Modified documents #8 and #9 to more accurately reflect documents filed. Docket text for document #8 now reads as Memorandum in Support of #9 Motion to Remand. Docket text for document #9 now reads as Motion to Remand, styled as Notice of Motion. Counsel is reminded that Memorandums and Exhibits should be filed as attachments to the motion and not as a separate docket entry. (crt,Thomas, T)
March 4, 2022 Filing 7 RESPONSE TO REMOVAL ORDER by Murphy Oil U S A Inc . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Notice of Removal, #2 Exhibit B - Return of Service The Hartford)(aty,Kean, Richard)
March 4, 2022 STATE COURT Service Returned Executed. Hartford answer due 3/2/2022. ADMINISTRATIVE ENTRY: The PDF image can be found within Attachment #2 of document #7 Response to Removal Order. (crt,Thomas, T)
March 2, 2022 Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Murphy Oil U S A Inc identifying Corporate Parent Murphy USA Inc. for Murphy Oil U S A Inc. (aty,Kean, Richard)
March 2, 2022 Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Murphy Oil U S A Inc.(aty,Kean, Richard)
February 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 REMOVAL ORDER regarding state court documents, pending motions, registry funds, and admission status of counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kayla D McClusky on 2/23/2022. (crt,Leday, A)
February 22, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE of Corporate Disclosure Statement Requirement re: #1 Notice of Removal, sent to Richard C Kean on behalf of Murphy Oil U S A Inc. Corporate Disclosure Statement due by 3/8/2022. (crt,Thomas, T)
February 22, 2022 Filing 2 PROPOSED REMOVAL ORDER Referred to Magistrate Judge Kayla D McClusky. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 2/22/2022. (crt,Thomas, T)
February 17, 2022 CASE Assigned to Judge Elizabeth E Foote and Magistrate Judge Kayla D McClusky. (crt,Thomas, T)
February 17, 2022 STATE COURT Service Returned Executed. Murphy Oil U S A Inc answer due 3/2/2022. ADMINISTRATIVE ENTRY: The PDF image can be found within Attachment #1 of document #1 Notice of Removal. (crt,Thomas, T)
February 17, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from 1st Judicial District Court Caddo Parish, Case Number 634717 (Filing fee $402, receipt number ALAWDC-5002404) filed by Murphy Oil USA, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Pleadings, #2 Civil cover sheet)(Attorney Richard C Kean added to party Murphy Oil USA, Inc.(pty:dft))(aty,Kean, Richard)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hunter v. Murphy Oil USA Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Murphy Oil USA, Inc.
Represented By: Richard C Kean
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Murphy Oil U S A Inc
Represented By: Michael A McGlone
Represented By: Richard C Kean
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hartford doing business as Twin City Fire Insurance Co
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Elnora Hunter
Represented By: S P Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?