Walls et al v. Caddo Parish et al
| Jason E Walls and William Walls |
| Sheriffs Office of Caddo Parish, Ryan Chapman and Stephen W Prator |
| 5:2022cv00579 |
| March 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Elizabeth E Foote |
| Mark L Hornsby |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
ORDER granting #15 Motion to Enroll as Counsel. Added as counsel Marshall Louis Perkins for Sheriffs Office of Caddo Parish,Marshall Louis Perkins for Ryan Chapman,Marshall Louis Perkins for Stephen W Prator. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 4/20/2022. (crt,Chavis, J)
|
| Filing 16 REPLY to Response to Motion re #4 MOTION to Dismiss For Failure to State a Claim Caddo Parish Sheriff Steve Prator and Deputy Ryan Chapman filed by Sheriffs Office of Caddo Parish, Ryan Chapman, Stephen W Prator. (aty,Perkins, Marshall) |
| Filing 15 MOTION for Marshall Louis Perkins to Enroll as Counsel by Sheriffs Office of Caddo Parish, Ryan Chapman, Stephen W Prator. Motions referred to Mark L Hornsby. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 4/18/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed order)(aty,Byrd, Edwin) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER granting #13 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #4 MOTION to Dismiss. Reply due by 4/18/2022. Signed by Judge Elizabeth E Foote on 4/8/2022. (crt,Keifer, K)
|
| Motions Transferred regarding #13 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #4 MOTION to Dismiss For Failure to State a Claim Caddo Parish Sheriff Steve Prator and Deputy Ryan Chapman with consent . Motions referred to Judge Elizabeth E Foote. (crt,Bunting, M) |
| Filing 13 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #4 MOTION to Dismiss For Failure to State a Claim Caddo Parish Sheriff Steve Prator and Deputy Ryan Chapman with consent by Ryan Chapman, Stephen W Prator. Motions referred to Mark L Hornsby. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 4/7/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed order)(aty,Byrd, Edwin) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #11 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #4 MOTION to Dismiss. Response due by 4/14/2022. Signed by Judge Elizabeth E Foote on 4/5/2022. (crt,Keifer, K)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response re #4 Motion to Dismiss with consent by Jason E Walls. Motions referred to Mark L Hornsby. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 4/4/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed order)(aty,Kendig, William) Modified on 4/4/2022 to create docket entry relationship and modify docket text. (Crick, S). |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Clerk's Notice re #9 Notice (Other) copy mailed to US Attorney Generals Office and courtesy copy sent to AUSA Jerry Edwards. (crt,Whitener, M) |
| Motions Transferred regarding #11 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response re #4 Motion to Dismiss with consent . Motions referred to Judge Elizabeth E Foote. (crt,Crick, S) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Rule 5.1 Notice of Constitutional Challenge to the Judicially Created Exception/Defense of Qualified Immunity to 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 by Jason E Walls (Attachments: #1 Proposed clerks notice)(aty,Kendig, William) |
| Filing 8 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #4 MOTION to Dismiss For Failure to State a Claim Caddo Parish Sheriff Steve Prator and Deputy Ryan Chapman filed by Jason E Walls. (aty,Kendig, William) |
| STATE COURT Service Returned Executed. Sheriffs Office of Caddo Parish answer due 3/8/2022; Ryan Chapman answer due 3/8/2022; Stephen W Prator answer due 3/8/2022. NO PDF ATTACHED - PDF of service returns attached to #7 Response to Removal Order, attachments #3, #4 and #5. (crt,Bunting, M) |
| Filing 7 RESPONSE TO REMOVAL ORDER by Ryan Chapman, Stephen W Prator . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 State court petition, #3 State court return of service, #4 State court return of service, #5 State court return of service)(aty,Byrd, Edwin) |
| Filing 6 ELECTRONIC JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW FINDING: Having reviewed the pleadings, and any amended pleadings, the court finds that subject matter jurisdiction exists pursuant to: 28 U.S.C. section 1331. This finding is preliminary and may be reconsidered sua sponte or on appropriate motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 3/3/2022. (crt,Rider, M) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Motion Setting regarding: #4 MOTION to Dismiss For Failure to State a Claim Caddo Parish Sheriff Steve Prator and Deputy Ryan Chapman. Motions referred to Judge Elizabeth E Foote. (crt,Bunting, M) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss For Failure to State a Claim Caddo Parish Sheriff Steve Prator and Deputy Ryan Chapman by Ryan Chapman, Stephen W Prator. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum / Brief, #2 Proposed order)(aty,Byrd, Edwin) |
|
Filing 3
REMOVAL ORDER regarding state court documents, pending motions, registry funds, and admission status of counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 3/2/2022. (crt,Keller, J)
|
| Filing 2 PROPOSED REMOVAL ORDER Referred to Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 3/1/2022. (crt,Whitener, M) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from 1st JDC Caddo Parish, Case Number 635246 (Filing fee $402, receipt number ALAWDC-5014522) filed by Steve Prator, Ryan Chapman. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet, #2 State court petition)(Attorney Edwin H Byrd, III added to party Ryan Chapman(pty:dft), Attorney Edwin H Byrd, III added to party Steve Prator(pty:dft))(aty,Byrd, Edwin) |
| CASE Assigned to Judge Elizabeth E Foote and Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby. (crt,Whitener, M) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
