Stonewater Roofing Ltd Co L L C v. Merryton Bossier L L C et al
Stonewater Roofing Ltd Co L L C |
Hui Ping Li, Merryton Bossier L L C, Nationwide General Insurance Co, Grace Chiao, James Lee Monkhouse and Scottsdale Insurance Co |
5:2022cv01048 |
April 20, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
S Maurice Hicks |
Mark L Hornsby |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Stonewater Roofing Ltd Co L L C. Grace Chiao served 6/3/2022, answer due 6/24/2022. (aty,Patin, Christopher) Modified docket text on 6/10/2022 (Miletello, A). |
Filing 12 ELECTRONIC JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW FINDING: Having reviewed the pleadings, and any amended pleadings, the court finds that subject matter jurisdiction exists pursuant to: 28 U.S.C. section 1332. This finding is preliminary and may be reconsidered sua sponte or on appropriate motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 5/31/2022. (crt,Rider, M) |
Filing 11 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against Grace Chiao, Hui Ping Li, Merryton Bossier L L C, Scottsdale Insurance Co with Jury Demand filed by Stonewater Roofing Ltd Co L L C. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(crt,Miletello, A) |
Filing 10 ORDER granting #9 Motion to Amend/Correct Amended Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 5/26/2022. (crt,Miletello, A) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Amend/Correct #4 Amended Complaint by Stonewater Roofing Ltd Co L L C. Motions referred to Mark L Hornsby. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 5/25/2022. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum / Brief, #2 Exhibit A to Memorandum, #3 Exhibit B to Memorandum, #4 Proposed order, #5 Proposed pleading Amended Complaint, #6 Proposed Exhibit A to Amended Complaint, #7 Proposed Exhibit B to Amended Complaint, #8 Proposed Exhibit C to Amended Complaint, #9 Proposed Exhibit D to Amended Complaint, #10 Proposed Exhibit E to Amended Complaint)(aty,Patin, Christopher) Modified docket text on 5/25/2022 (Miletello, A). |
Filing 8 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Stonewater Roofing Ltd Co L L C. (aty,Patin, Christopher) |
Filing 7 ELECTRONIC ORDER: Plaintiff's original complaint named defendants that included Nationwide. The court issued a memorandum order (Doc. #6 ) that directed Plaintiff to file an amended complaint and provide additional information about the citizenship of certain parties, including Nationwide. Between the preparation and filing of the memorandum order, Plaintiff filed an amended complaint that dropped Nationwide as a defendant. Accordingly, it is not mandatory that Plaintiff include information about Nationwide in the amended complaint ordered by the court (which will now require a motion for leave to amend, since the one free amendment allowed by Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 15(a) has been used). Even if Nationwide were nondiverse, Plaintiff could voluntarily dismiss a dispensable nondiverse defendant to create complete diversity of citizenship. Grupo Dataflux v. Atlas Glob. Grp., L.P., 541 U.S. 567, 572-73 (2004). Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 5/4/2022. (crt,Rider, M) |
Filing 6 MEMORANDUM ORDER. Stonewater must specifically allege in its amended complaint whether Nationwide is a corporation or some other form of entity. If it is a corporation, the complaint must allege its state of incorporation. If it is an unincorporated entity, the complaint must allege the citizenship of each of its members. Stonewater must file its amended complaint no later than May 13, 2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 5/2/2022. (crt,Keller, J) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Scottsdale Insurance Co. (crt,Miletello, A) |
Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Grace Chiao, Hui Ping Li, Merryton Bossier L L C, Scottsdale Insurance Co with Jury Demand filed by Stonewater Roofing Ltd Co L L C. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Proposed summons/writ, #7 Proposed summons/writ, #8 Proposed summons/writ, #9 Proposed summons/writ)(aty,Patin, Christopher) Modified docket text on 4/26/2022 (Miletello, A). |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Corporate Disclosure Statement Requirement re: #1 Complaint sent to Christopher Michael Patin on behalf of Stonewater Roofing Ltd Co L L C. Corporate Disclosure Statement due by 5/5/2022. (crt,Miletello, A) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Grace Chiao, Hui Ping Li, Merryton Bossier L L C, Nationwide General Insurance Co. (crt,Miletello, A) |
DIVISIONAL TRANSFER of Old Case Number 1:22-cv-1048 from Alexandria Division to Shreveport Division. New Case Number 5:22-cv-1048. (crt,Miletello, A) |
CASE Assigned to Chief Judge S Maurice Hicks, Jr and Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby. (crt,Miletello, A) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Grace Chiao, Hui Ping Li, Merryton Bossier L L C, Nationwide General Insurance Co with Jury Demand (Filing fee $402, receipt number ALAWDC-5075994) filed by Stonewater Roofing Ltd Co L L C. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Elements of offense C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Proposed summons/writ, #8 Proposed summons/writ, #9 Proposed summons/writ, #10 Proposed summons/writ)(Attorney Christopher Michael Patin added to party Stonewater Roofing Ltd Co L L C(pty:pla))(aty,Patin, Christopher) (Attachments 7, 8, 9, 10 replaced with non-fillable pdf and modify docket text on 4/21/2022) (Miletello, A). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.