Quarles v. McClaran et al
Benjamin L Quarles |
Chris McClaran, Chris Hammontree, Steve Cropper and City of Minden |
5:2022cv01326 |
May 18, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
S Maurice Hicks |
Mark L Hornsby |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 (DO NOT USE) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint,. Steve Cropper answer due 7/18/2022; Chris Hammontree answer due 7/18/2022; Chris McClaran answer due 7/18/2022; City of Minden answer due 7/18/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 6/21/2022. (crt,Chavis, J) Modified to correct docket text on 7/13/2022 (Chavis, J). |
Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, with consent by Steve Cropper, Chris Hammontree, Chris McClaran, City of Minden. Motions referred to Mark L Hornsby. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 6/17/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed order)(Attorney Edwin H Byrd, III added to party Steve Cropper(pty:dft), Attorney Edwin H Byrd, III added to party Chris Hammontree(pty:dft), Attorney Edwin H Byrd, III added to party Chris McClaran(pty:dft), Attorney Edwin H Byrd, III added to party City of Minden(pty:dft))(aty,Byrd, Edwin) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Benjamin L Quarles. Chris Hammontree served on 5/27/2022, answer due 6/17/2022. (aty,Benson, J) |
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW FINDING: Having reviewed the pleadings, and any amended pleadings, the court finds that subject matter jurisdiction exists pursuant to: 28 U.S.C. section 1331. This finding is preliminary and may be reconsidered sua sponte or on appropriate motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 5/25/2022. (crt,Rider, M) |
Filing 5 Summons Returned Executed by Benjamin L Quarles. City of Minden served on 5/23/2022, answer due 6/13/2022. (aty,Benson, J) Modified on 5/24/2022 to more accurately describe pleading submitted and to add service and answer dates (Miletello, A). |
Filing 4 Summons Returned Executed by Benjamin L Quarles. Steve Cropper served on 5/23/2022, answer due 6/13/2022. (aty,Benson, J) Modified on 5/24/2022 to more accurately describe pleading submitted and to add service and answer dates (Miletello, A). |
Filing 3 Summons Returned Executed by Benjamin L Quarles. Chris McClaran served on 5/23/2022, answer due 6/13/2022 (aty,Benson, J) Modified on 5/24/2022 to more accurately describe pleading submitted and to add service and answer dates (Miletello, A). |
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Benjamin L Quarles. Steve Cropper served on 5/23/2022, answer due 6/13/2022; Chris McClaran served on 5/23/2022, answer due 6/13/2022; City of Minden served on 5/23/2022, answer due 6/13/2022. ADMINISTRATIVE ENTRY to capture correct filing event and answer due date. See pdf documents filed at #3 , #4 and #5 . (crt,Miletello, A) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Steve Cropper, Chris Hammontree, Chris McClaran, City of Minden. (crt,Crick, S) |
CASE Assigned to Chief Judge S Maurice Hicks, Jr and Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby. (crt,Crick, S) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Steve Cropper, Chris Hammontree, Chris McClaran, City of Minden with Jury Demand (Filing fee $402, receipt number ALAWDC-5108829) filed by Benjamin L Quarles. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet)(Attorney J Todd Benson added to party Benjamin L Quarles(pty:pla))(aty,Benson, J) Modified on 5/19/2022 to modify docket text. (Crick, S). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.