Legrande et al v. Vine Energy Operating L P
| William Clayton Legrande, Dolly Bell LeGrande and Robert C LeGrande |
| Vine Energy Operating L P and Vine Oil & Gas L P |
| 5:2022cv01349 |
| May 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Elizabeth E Foote |
| Mark L Hornsby |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Corporate Disclosure Statement Requirement re: #6 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim,, Motion for Summary Judgment,, sent to Sarah Katherine Casey on behalf of Vine Energy Operating L P. Corporate Disclosure Statement due by 7/20/2022. (crt,Chavis, J) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Motion Setting regarding: #6 MOTION to Dismiss For Failure to State a Claim all claims against Vine MOTION for Summary Judgment . Motions referred to Judge Elizabeth E Foote. (crt,Chavis, J) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss For Failure to State a Claim all claims against Vine, MOTION for Summary Judgment by Vine Energy Operating L P. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum / Brief Memo in SUpport, #2 Exhibit 1-Delaware Secretary of State docs, #3 Exhibit 2-Chesapeake's Assistant Secretary's Certificate, #4 Statement of material facts)(Attorney Sarah Katherine Casey added to party Vine Energy Operating L P(pty:dft))(aty,Casey, Sarah) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by William Clayton Legrande, Robert C LeGrande, Dolly Bell LeGrande. Vine Energy Operating L P served on 6/15/2022, answer due 7/6/2022. (aty,Kelley, Matthew) |
| Filing 4 FILED IN ERROR: THIS DOCUMENT IS A DUPLICATE OF DOCUMENT #5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by William Clayton Legrande, Robert C LeGrande, Dolly Bell LeGrande. Vine Energy Operating L P served on 6/8/2022, answer due 6/29/2022. (aty,Kelley, Matthew) Modified to reflect duplicate pleading filed in error and correct service and answer deadlines as an erroneous service date was entered at the time of e-filing on 6/16/2022 (Chavis, J). |
| NOTICE of Corrective Action to Matthew S Kelley on behalf of Dolly Bell LeGrande, Robert C LeGrande, William Clayton Legrande regarding #4 Summons Returned Executed. Action taken: modified text to reflect filing as a duplicate entry. (crt,Chavis, J) |
Filing 3
MEMORANDUM ORDER: Vine is ordered to include in its answer a detailed allegation of its citizenship in accordance with the rules set forth . Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 5/23/2022. (crt,Chavis, J)
|
| REMARK: Multiple charges were incurred during the filing of the #1 Complaint. Refunds of the three initial payments of $402.00 each, Receipt #ALAWDC-5110964, #ALAWDC-5111034, and #ALAWDC-5111078, have been processed in pay.gov this date. Counsel is advised to verify the refunds on their statement. (crt,McInnis, S) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Vine Energy Operating L P. (crt,Chavis, J) |
| CASE Assigned to Judge Elizabeth E Foote and Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby. (crt,Chavis, J) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $402, receipt number ALAWDC-5111141) filed by William Clayton Legrande, Robert C LeGrande, Dolly Bell LeGrande. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet)(Attorney Matthew S Kelley added to party Dolly Bell LeGrande(pty:pet), Attorney Matthew S Kelley added to party Robert C LeGrande(pty:pet), Attorney Matthew S Kelley added to party William Clayton Legrande(pty:pet))(aty,Kelley, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
