Woodmont Co Inc v. Foot Locker Retail Inc
Foot Locker Retail Inc doing business as Champs Sports doing business as Foot Locker |
Woodmont Co Inc |
Foot Locker Retail Inc |
Pierre Bossier Mall L L C |
5:2022cv01579 |
June 9, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
Elizabeth E Foote |
Mark L Hornsby |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer #8 Answer to Counterclaim. Woodmont Co Inc answer due 8/19/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 7/21/2022. (crt,Chavis, J) |
Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #8 ANSWER to Complaint , THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT against Pierre Bossier Mall L L C, COUNTERCLAIM by Woodmont Co Inc. Motions referred to Mark L Hornsby. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 7/21/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed order)(aty,Kerth, David) Modified properly capture motion event on 7/21/2022 (Chavis, J). Modified to add docket entry relationship on 7/21/2022 (Chavis, J). |
NOTICE of Corrective Action to David M Kerth on behalf of Woodmont Co Inc regarding #10 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. Action taken: Modified entry to more accurately identify the pleading submitted. (crt,Chavis, J) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Pierre Bossier Mall L L C. (crt,Thomas, T) |
Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint , THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT against Pierre Bossier Mall L L C, COUNTERCLAIM against Woodmont Co Inc by Foot Locker Retail Inc.(aty,Stein, Mark) Modified to correct third party defendant on 7/1/2022 (Thomas, T). |
Filing 7 ELECTRONIC JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW FINDING: Having reviewed the pleadings, and any amended pleadings, the court finds that subject matter jurisdiction exists pursuant to: 28 U.S.C. section 1332. This finding is preliminary and may be reconsidered sua sponte or on appropriate motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 6/22/2022. (crt,Rider, M) |
Filing 6 ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Notice of Removal. Foot Locker Retail Inc answer due 7/1/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 6/15/2022. (crt,Chavis, J) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer with consent by Foot Locker Retail Inc. Motions referred to Mark L Hornsby. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 6/14/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Proposed order)(aty,Stein, Mark) |
Filing 4 REMOVAL ORDER regarding state court documents, pending motions, registry funds, and admission status of counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 6/13/2022. (crt,Keller, J) |
Filing 3 PROPOSED REMOVAL ORDER. Referred to Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 6/13/2022. (crt,Miletello, A) |
CASE Assigned to Judge Elizabeth E Foote and Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby. (crt,Miletello, A) |
Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Foot Locker Retail Inc identifying Corporate Parent Foot Locker Inc for Foot Locker Retail Inc. (aty,Stein, Mark) Modified docket text on 6/13/2022 (Miletello, A). |
Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from 26th JDC, Bossier Parish, Case Number C-167293 (Filing fee $402, receipt number ALAWDC-5134223) filed by Foot Locker Retail Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Civil cover sheet, #3 Affidavit, #4 Exhibit)(Attorney Mark S Stein added to party Foot Locker Retail Inc(pty:dft))(aty,Stein, Mark) Modified docket text on 6/13/2022 (Miletello, A). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.