Woodmont Co Inc v. Foot Locker Retail Inc
Defendant: Foot Locker Retail Inc doing business as Champs Sports doing business as Foot Locker
Counter Defendant: Woodmont Co Inc
3Rd Party Plaintiff: Foot Locker Retail Inc
3Rd Party Defendant: Pierre Bossier Mall L L C
Case Number: 5:2022cv01579
Filed: June 9, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana
Presiding Judge: Elizabeth E Foote
Referring Judge: Mark L Hornsby
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer #8 Answer to Counterclaim. Woodmont Co Inc answer due 8/19/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 7/21/2022. (crt,Chavis, J)
July 21, 2022 Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #8 ANSWER to Complaint , THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT against Pierre Bossier Mall L L C, COUNTERCLAIM by Woodmont Co Inc. Motions referred to Mark L Hornsby. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 7/21/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed order)(aty,Kerth, David) Modified properly capture motion event on 7/21/2022 (Chavis, J). Modified to add docket entry relationship on 7/21/2022 (Chavis, J).
July 21, 2022 NOTICE of Corrective Action to David M Kerth on behalf of Woodmont Co Inc regarding #10 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. Action taken: Modified entry to more accurately identify the pleading submitted. (crt,Chavis, J)
July 1, 2022 Filing 9 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Pierre Bossier Mall L L C. (crt,Thomas, T)
July 1, 2022 Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint , THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT against Pierre Bossier Mall L L C, COUNTERCLAIM against Woodmont Co Inc by Foot Locker Retail Inc.(aty,Stein, Mark) Modified to correct third party defendant on 7/1/2022 (Thomas, T).
June 22, 2022 Filing 7 ELECTRONIC JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW FINDING: Having reviewed the pleadings, and any amended pleadings, the court finds that subject matter jurisdiction exists pursuant to: 28 U.S.C. section 1332. This finding is preliminary and may be reconsidered sua sponte or on appropriate motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 6/22/2022. (crt,Rider, M)
June 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Notice of Removal. Foot Locker Retail Inc answer due 7/1/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 6/15/2022. (crt,Chavis, J)
June 14, 2022 Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer with consent by Foot Locker Retail Inc. Motions referred to Mark L Hornsby. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 6/14/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Proposed order)(aty,Stein, Mark)
June 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 REMOVAL ORDER regarding state court documents, pending motions, registry funds, and admission status of counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 6/13/2022. (crt,Keller, J)
June 13, 2022 Filing 3 PROPOSED REMOVAL ORDER. Referred to Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 6/13/2022. (crt,Miletello, A)
June 9, 2022 CASE Assigned to Judge Elizabeth E Foote and Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby. (crt,Miletello, A)
June 9, 2022 Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Foot Locker Retail Inc identifying Corporate Parent Foot Locker Inc for Foot Locker Retail Inc. (aty,Stein, Mark) Modified docket text on 6/13/2022 (Miletello, A).
June 9, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from 26th JDC, Bossier Parish, Case Number C-167293 (Filing fee $402, receipt number ALAWDC-5134223) filed by Foot Locker Retail Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Civil cover sheet, #3 Affidavit, #4 Exhibit)(Attorney Mark S Stein added to party Foot Locker Retail Inc(pty:dft))(aty,Stein, Mark) Modified docket text on 6/13/2022 (Miletello, A).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Woodmont Co Inc v. Foot Locker Retail Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter defendant: Woodmont Co Inc
Represented By: David M Kerth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
3rd party plaintiff: Foot Locker Retail Inc
Represented By: Mark S Stein
Represented By: Melanie C Lockett
Represented By: Mitchell J Hoffman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Foot Locker Retail Inc doing business as Champs Sports doing business as Foot Locker
Represented By: Mark S Stein
Represented By: Melanie C Lockett
Represented By: Mitchell J Hoffman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
3rd party defendant: Pierre Bossier Mall L L C
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?