Hill v. Wooley et al
Lisa Hill and **Sanctioned/Barred* Lisa Hill |
Frank Wooley, Emily Merckle and Terri Levington |
5:2022cv01697 |
June 9, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
S Maurice Hicks |
Mark L Hornsby |
Civil Rights: Accommodations |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Complaint filed by Lisa Hill. It is recommended that Plaintiff's complaint be dismissed with prejudice because all claims asserted in it are barred by judicial immunity or fail to state a claim on which relief may be granted. Objections to R&R due by 7/12/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 6/28/2022. (crt,Keller, J) |
CASE Assigned to Chief Judge S Maurice Hicks, Jr and Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby. (crt,Bunting, M) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Lisa Hill. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 6/9/2022. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(crt,Lemoine, N) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/23/2022: #2 Proposed order) (Bunting, M). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Terri Levington, Emily Merckle, Frank Wooley filed by Lisa Hill. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet, #2 Exhibits, #3 Envelope)(crt,Lemoine, N) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.