Hogan v. Louisiana C V S Pharmacy L L C et al
| William Hogan |
| Louisiana CVS Pharmacy, LLC, XZY Insurance Co., Louisiana C V S Pharmacy L L C and X Y Z Insurance Co |
| 5:2022cv02197 |
| July 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Elizabeth E Foote |
| Mark L Hornsby |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #11 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer #1 Notice of Removal. Louisiana C V S Pharmacy L L C answer due 10/28/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 8/26/2022. (crt,Keifer, K)
|
| Filing 11 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer with consent responsive pleadings by Louisiana C V S Pharmacy L L C. Motions referred to Mark L Hornsby. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 8/24/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed order)(aty,Collura-Day, Amanda) Modified event to more accurately describe document filed on 8/24/2022 (Bunting, M). |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE to Removal Order filed by Louisiana C V S Pharmacy L L C. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - CVS Notice of Removal)(aty,Gunnels, Molly) Modified on 8/23/2022 (Bunting, M). |
| Filing 9 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Louisiana C V S Pharmacy L L C. C V S Pharmacy Inc Corporate Parent to C V S Pharmacy L L C (aty,Gunnels, Molly) Modified to add corporate parent on 8/5/2022 (Bunting, M). |
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer with consent . Louisiana C V S Pharmacy L L C answer due 8/29/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 7/28/2022. (crt,Bunting, M)
|
| Filing 7 ELECTRONIC JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW FINDING: Having reviewed the pleadings, and any amended pleadings, the court finds that subject matter jurisdiction exists pursuant to: 28 U.S.C. section 1332. This finding is preliminary and may be reconsidered sua sponte or on appropriate motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 7/27/2022. (crt,Rider, M) |
| Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer with consent by Louisiana C V S Pharmacy L L C. Motions referred to Mark L Hornsby. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 7/27/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed order)(aty,Collura-Day, Amanda) |
|
Filing 5
REMOVAL ORDER regarding state court documents, pending motions, registry funds, and admission status of counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 7/25/2022. (crt,Enkey, R)
|
| Filing 4 PROPOSED REMOVAL ORDER Referred to Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 7/22/2022. (crt,Bunting, M) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Corporate Disclosure Statement Requirement re: #1 Notice of Removal, sent to Molly Gunnels on behalf of Louisiana C V S Pharmacy L L C. Corporate Disclosure Statement due by 8/5/2022. (crt,Bunting, M) |
| CASE Assigned to Judge Elizabeth E Foote and Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby. (crt,Bunting, M) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Louisiana CVS Pharmacy, LLC. (aty,Gunnels, Molly) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from 1st JDC Caddo Parish, Case Number 637398-B with Jury Demand; (Filing fee $402, receipt number ALAWDC-5184565) filed by Louisiana CVS Pharmacy, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A)(Attorney Molly Gunnels added to party Louisiana CVS Pharmacy, LLC(pty:dft))(aty,Gunnels, Molly) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
