McDonald v. Banbury et al
Bryan Z McDonald |
Adam Banbury, Farmers Texas County Mutual Insurance Company, GEICO Casualty Company, Adam C Banbury, Farmers Texas County Mutual Insurance Co and Geico Casualty Co |
5:2022cv02201 |
July 21, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
S Maurice Hicks |
Mark L Hornsby |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ELECTRONIC MINUTE ENTRY: The telephone Scheduling Conference originally set for 10/11/22 has been reset for 10/3/2022 at 10:30 AM Dial-in instructions have been emailed to all counsel of record. Trial counsel for each party must participate. The Rule 26 Case Management Report is due by 9/26/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 9/15/2022. (crt,Rider, M) |
Filing 11 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Geico Casualty Co. (aty,Smitherman, John) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Corporate Disclosure Statement Requirement re: #8 Answer to Complaint sent to John Bradley Smitherman on behalf of Geico Casualty Co. Corporate Disclosure Statement due by 9/27/2022. (crt,Crick, S) |
Filing 9 ORDER: Scheduling Conference set for 10/11/2022 10:00 AM by telephone before Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby. Rule 26 Conference between parties to take place before 9/27/2022. Initial Disclosures exchanged by 10/4/2022. Rule 26 Report due by 10/4/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 9/6/2022. (crt,Keller, J) |
Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Geico Casualty Co.(Attorney John Bradley Smitherman added to party Geico Casualty Co(pty:dft))(aty,Smitherman, John) |
Filing 7 ELECTRONIC JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW FINDING: Having reviewed the pleadings, and any amended pleadings, the court finds that subject matter jurisdiction exists pursuant to: 28 U.S.C. section 1332. This finding is preliminary and may be reconsidered sua sponte or on appropriate motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 7/27/2022. (crt,Rider, M) |
Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Adam C Banbury, Farmers Texas County Mutual Insurance Co.(aty,Mijalis, Alexander) |
Filing 5 RESPONSE TO REMOVAL ORDER by Adam C Banbury, Farmers Texas County Mutual Insurance Co . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Affidavit of Service - 1, #2 Exhibit Affidavit of Service - 2)(aty,Mijalis, Alexander) |
Filing 4 REMOVAL ORDER regarding state court documents, pending motions, registry funds, and admission status of counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 7/25/2022. (crt,Enkey, R) |
Filing 3 PROPOSED REMOVAL ORDER Referred to Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 7/22/2022. (crt,Crick, S) |
CASE Assigned to Chief Judge S Maurice Hicks, Jr and Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby. (crt,Crick, S) |
Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Farmers Texas County Mutual Insurance Co. (aty,Mijalis, Alexander) Modified on 7/22/2022 to modify docket text.(Crick, S). |
Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from 1st JDC Caddo Parish, Case Number 637812-A with Jury Demand; (Filing fee $402, receipt number ALAWDC-5184741) filed by Farmers Texas County Mutual Insurance Co, Adam C Banbury. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit state court petition, #2 Civil cover sheet civil cover sheet)(Attorney Alexander John Mijalis added to party Adam C Banbury(pty:dft), Farmers Texas County Mutual Insurance Co(pty:dft))(aty,Mijalis, Alexander) Modified on 7/22/2022 to modify docket text. (Crick, S). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.