Johnson v. O'Callaghan et al
| Kareem Abdul Johnson |
| Brady D O'Callaghan and Caddo Parish 1st Judicial District Court |
| 5:2022cv05337 |
| September 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| S Maurice Hicks |
| Kayla D McClusky |
| Prisoner Petitions: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 LETTER from Plaintiff to Clerk regarding #9 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Kareem Abdul Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (crt,Haik, K) |
| Filing 12 DUPLICATE CORRECTIVE DOCUMENT entitled accounts officer page filed by Kareem Abdul Johnson regarding #9 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (Complete ifp was received on 11/3/22.) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(crt,Haik, K) |
| Filing 11 REQUEST from Kareem Johnson for docket sheet. Clerk mailed docket sheet on 11/16/2022. (Public entry, but no electronic notice.) (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (crt,Williams, G) |
Filing 10
MEMORANDUM ORDER denying #9 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that for Plaintiff's claims to remain viable, Plaintiff must pay the full $402.00 filing fee in one lump sum within twenty (21) days from the date of this Memorandum Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kayla D McClusky on 11/9/2022. (crt,Haik, K)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kareem Abdul Johnson. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Kayla D McClusky. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 11/3/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(crt,Haik, K) |
| Filing 8 COMPLAINT against Brady D O'Callaghan filed by Kareem Abdul Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(crt,Haik, K) |
| Filing 7 DEFICIENT MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kareem Abdul Johnson. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Kayla D McClusky. (No accounts officer page. Clerk resent ifp page 6 with a note stating it must be completed.) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(crt,Haik, K) |
| Filing 6 COMPLAINT against Brady D O'Callaghan filed by Kareem Abdul Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(crt,Haik, K) |
| Filing 5 LETTER, styled Memorandum in Support from Kareem A Johnson regarding non-receipt of civil rights complaint form nor IFP application. Copy of said forms were mailed to plaintiff on 10/17/2022. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (crt,Taylor, L) |
|
Filing 4
MEMORANDUM ORDER: Plaintiff failed to submit documents on approved forms. Plaintiff failed to submit filing fee or a completed IFP application. ( Pro Se Deadline to comply with deficiency set for 11/7/2022). Signed by Magistrate Judge Kayla D McClusky on 10/7/2022. (crt,Leday, A) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/24/2022: #1 1983 form, #2 ifp form) (Haik, K).
|
| Filing 3 PROPOSED MEMORANDUM ORDER Referred to Magistrate Judge Kayla D McClusky. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 10/6/2022. (crt,Devillier, W) |
| CASE Assigned to Chief Judge S Maurice Hicks, Jr and Magistrate Judge Kayla D McClusky. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Kayla D McClusky. (crt,Devillier, W) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Kareem Abdul Johnson. (crt,Haik, K) |
| Filing 1 DEFICIENT COMPLAINT against Caddo Parish 1st Judicial District Court, Brady D O'Callaghan filed by Kareem Abdul Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Envelope)(crt,Lemoine, N). Complaint not on approved form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
