Thomas v. Moore et al
| Ronny Lee Thomas |
| Tony R Moore and Steve Prator |
| 5:2022cv06232 |
| December 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| S Maurice Hicks |
| Kayla D McClusky |
| Prisoner Petitions: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 RESPONSE in Support by Ronny Lee Thomas re #1 Complaint. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Envelope)(crt,Haik, K) |
| Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: IT IS RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's claims be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Objections to R&R due by 1/27/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kayla D McClusky on 1/13/2023. (crt,Leday, A) |
Filing 3
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kayla D McClusky on 1/9/2023. (crt,Leday, A)
|
| CASE Assigned to Judge S Maurice Hicks, Jr and Magistrate Judge Kayla D McClusky. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Kayla D McClusky. (crt,Devillier, W) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ronny Lee Thomas. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 12/15/2022. (crt,Whidden, C) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/6/2023: #1 Proposed order) (Devillier, W). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Tony R Moore, Steve Prator filed by Ronny Lee Thomas. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet, #2 Envelope)(crt,Whidden, C) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
