Wilcoxen et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Co
| Gerald Wilcoxen and Martha Wilcoxen |
| Union Pacific Railroad Company and Union Pacific Railroad Co |
| 5:2024cv00164 |
| February 5, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| S Maurice Hicks |
| Mark L Hornsby |
| Torts to Land |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 RESPONSE TO REMOVAL ORDER by Union Pacific Railroad Co . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit "1" - State Court Record)(aty,Harrell, James) |
Filing 12
ORDER: Scheduling Conference set for 4/15/2024 10:30 AM by phone before Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby. Rule 26 Conference between parties to take place before 4/1/2024. Initial Disclosures exchanged by 4/8/2024. Rule 26 Report due by 4/8/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 2/29/2024. (crt,Keller, J)
|
| Filing 11 ELECTRONIC JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW FINDING: Having reviewed the pleadings, and any amended pleadings, the court finds that subject matter jurisdiction exists pursuant to: 28 U.S.C. section 1332. This finding is preliminary and may be reconsidered sua sponte or on appropriate motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 2/29/2024. (crt,Rider, M) |
| Filing 10 DIVERSITY JURISDICTION DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Gerald Wilcoxen, Martha Wilcoxen. (aty,Benson, J) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by Union Pacific Railroad Co.(aty,Harrell, James) |
| Filing 8 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Union Pacific Railroad Co identifying Corporate Parent Union Pacific Corporation, Other Affiliate Union Pacific Railroad Company, Other Affiliate Southern Pacific Transportation Company, Other Affiliate Missouri Pacific Railroad Company for Union Pacific Railroad Co. (aty,Harrell, James) |
| Filing 7 DIVERSITY JURISDICTION DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Union Pacific Railroad Co. (aty,Harrell, James) |
|
Filing 6
REMOVAL ORDER regarding state court documents, pending motions, registry funds, and admission status of counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 2/7/2024. (crt,Enkey, R)
|
| Filing 5 PROPOSED REMOVAL ORDER Referred to Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby. Motion Ripe Deadline set for 2/6/2024. (crt,Bunting, M) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Diversity Jurisdiction Disclosure Statement Requirement re: #1 Notice of Removal, sent to James A Harrell on behalf of Union Pacific Railroad Co AND J Todd Benson on behalf of Gerald Wilcoxen, Martha Wilcoxen. Diversity Jurisdiction Disclosure Statement due by 2/20/2024. (crt,Bunting, M) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Corporate Disclosure Statement Requirement re: #1 Notice of Removal, sent to James A Harrell on behalf of Union Pacific Railroad Co. Corporate Disclosure Statement due by 2/20/2024. (crt,Bunting, M) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge S Maurice Hicks, Jr. District Judge Jerry Edwards, Jr no longer assigned to case. Signed by District Judge Jerry Edwards, Jr on 2/6/2024. (crt,Bunting, M)
|
| CASE Assigned to District Judge Jerry Edwards, Jr and Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby. (crt,Bunting, M) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from 42nd JDC, DeSoto Parish, Case Number 84,774 with Jury Demand; (Filing fee $405, receipt number ALAWDC-5847252) filed by Union Pacific Railroad Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet, #2 Exhibit "A" - State Court Record)(Attorney James A Harrell added to party Union Pacific Railroad Company(pty:dft))(aty,Harrell, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
