Gadpaille et al v. Surechoice Underwriters Reciprocal Exchange
| Nicolas Gadpaille and Miranda Gadpaille |
| Surechoice Underwriters Reciprocal Exchange |
| 5:2024cv01105 |
| August 15, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Jerry Edwards |
| Mark L Hornsby |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Nicolas Gadpaille, Miranda Gadpaille (aty,Odom, James) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Nicolas Gadpaille, Miranda Gadpaille. Surechoice Underwriters Reciprocal Exchange served on 8/16/2024, answer due 9/6/2024. (aty,Odom, James) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Surechoice Underwriters Reciprocal Exchange. (crt,Thomas, T) |
| Filing 2 DIVERSITY JURISDICTION DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Miranda Gadpaille, Nicolas Gadpaille. (aty,Odom, James) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Surechoice Underwriters Reciprocal Exchange with Jury Demand (Filing fee $405, receipt number ALAWDC-6029826) filed by Nicolas Gadpaille, Miranda Gadpaille. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet)(Attorney James Huntington Odom, III added to party Miranda Gadpaille(pty:pla), Attorney James Huntington Odom, III added to party Nicolas Gadpaille(pty:pla))(aty,Odom, James) |
| CASE Assigned to Judge Jerry Edwards, Jr and Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby. (crt,Thomas, T) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
