Sobolak v. Edwards et al
| Andrew Thomas Sobolak |
| John Mahfouz, Glen T Edwards, David Hensley and Eli Hay |
| 5:2024cv01393 |
| October 9, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| S Maurice Hicks |
| Mark L Hornsby |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
MEMORANDUM ORDER: Plaintiff must complete service and file evidence of service within 90 days of the filing of his complaint, which will be January 7, 2025. Failure to do so may result in dismissal of this civil action. Plaintiff must keep the court informed of a current address. If at any time Plaintiff does not wish to pursue this case, Plaintiff may communicate that to the court in writing, and the case will be dismissed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby on 10/16/2024. (crt,Thomas, T)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Compliance Deadline set for 1/7/2025. (crt,Thomas, T) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Glen T Edwards, Eli Hay, David Hensley, John Mahfouz. (crt,Thomas, T) |
| CASE Assigned to Judge S Maurice Hicks, Jr and Magistrate Judge Mark L Hornsby. (crt,Thomas, T) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Glen T Edwards, Eli Hay, David Hensley, John Mahfouz with Jury Demand (Receipt number 500003218, filing fee $405) filed by Andrew Thomas Sobolak. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet, #2 Envelope)(crt,Bowman, A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
