New England Insurance Co v. Barnett
| 6:2006cv00555 |
| March 30, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Insurance Office |
| Rebecca F Doherty |
| Mildred E Methvin |
| None |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
144
MEMORANDUM RULING re 105 MOTION for Summary Judgment As to Barnett's Enforcement of the Consent Judgment filed by New England Insurance Co. Signed by Judge Elizabeth E Foote on 3/16/2011. (crt,Joffrion, B)
|
|
Filing
53
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 48 MOTION to Dismiss Partially Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) filed by New England Insurance Co and 52 JOINT/VOLUNTARY MOTION to Dismiss filed by Richard D Barnett. IT IS RECOMMENDED that plaintiffs unopposed motion for p artial dismissal (Rec. 48) and Barnetts voluntary motion to dismiss (Rec. 52) both be GRANTED, and that Barnetts counterclaim against New England for damages as a result of an alleged defamatory statement made in New Englands motion for declaratory judgment be DISMISSED with prejudice. Objections to R&R due by 6/12/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mildred E Methvin on 5/26/09. (crt,Smith, C)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: New England Insurance Co v. Barnett | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
