Case name not on file

Case Number: 6:2010cv00714
Filed: April 28, 2010
Court: Louisiana Western District Court
Office: Lafayette Office
County: Acadia
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 22, 2010 35 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT ADOPTING the 33 Report and Recommendations. The Court concludes that the Report and Recommendation of the magistrate judge is correct. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Ace's Motion to Dismiss for lack of personal Jurisdiction and Impro per Venue pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(2) and 12(b)(3), respectively, and Ace's Motion to Transfer pursuant to 28 USC Section 1406 and 1404, Rec. Doc. 24 , in response to PetroQuest's claims, are DISMISSED AS MOOT, since the grant of Ace's previous Motion to Transfer pursuant to 28 USC Section 1404(a) pretermits any need for the Court to consider these Motions. Signed by Judge Rebecca F Doherty on 11/22/10. (crt,Guidry, C)
October 12, 2010 33 Opinion or Order of the Court REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 24 MOTION to Dismiss or in the alternative Motion to Transfer filed by Ace American Insurance Co, 24 MOTION to Transfer Case filed by Ace American Insurance Co. Objections to R&R due by 10/29/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge C Michael Hill on 10/11/2010. (crt,Davenport, M)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case:
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?