Caffey et al v. Domingue et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|February 22, 2011
MEMORANDUM RULING: RULE 7(a) HEIGHTENED PLEADING REVIEW. Although the Court may later determine the facts in favor of the defendants, the sole issue presented here is whether the plaintiffs have satisfied the heightened pleading requirement of Shult ea v Wood. The undersigned concludes that they have. Accordingly, the undersigned concludes that there is no need for an order banning or limiting discovery with regard to the plaintiffs' claims against the defendants, and the case should proceed in accordance with the existing Scheduling Order ( Rec Doc 6). Signed by Magistrate Judge Patrick J Hanna on 02/22/11. (crt,Yocum, M)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?