Caffey et al v. Domingue et al
| Carl L. Caffey and Cynthia C. Caffey |
| Lonis D. Domingue, Sr. and Wayne A. Melancon |
| 6:2010cv01545 |
| October 8, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Lafayette Office |
| Acadia |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
70
MEMORANDUM RULING re 57 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment on the Issues of Liability for Unlawful Seizure/False Arrest/Battery and Excessive Force filed by Cynthia C Caffey, Carl L Caffey. The motion is opposed, and oral argument was held on March 22, 2018. Considering the evidence, the law, and the arguments of the parties, and for the reasons fully explained below, the motion is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patrick J Hanna on 4/23/2018. (crt,Alexander, E)
|
|
Filing
8
MEMORANDUM RULING: RULE 7(a) HEIGHTENED PLEADING REVIEW. Although the Court may later determine the facts in favor of the defendants, the sole issue presented here is whether the plaintiffs have satisfied the heightened pleading requirement of Shult ea v Wood. The undersigned concludes that they have. Accordingly, the undersigned concludes that there is no need for an order banning or limiting discovery with regard to the plaintiffs' claims against the defendants, and the case should proceed in accordance with the existing Scheduling Order ( Rec Doc 6). Signed by Magistrate Judge Patrick J Hanna on 02/22/11. (crt,Yocum, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
