Pegasus International Inc v. Champagne et al
| Pegasus International Inc |
| R Carson Vizina, Andre Vizina, Ron Champagne, Mike Domingue and Brandon Vizina |
| 6:2011cv01402 |
| July 28, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Lafayette Office |
| Lafayette |
| Rebecca F Doherty |
| C Michael Hill |
| Other Contract |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1030 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
99
JUDGMENT ADOPTING 67 Report and Recommendations. 98 Report and Recommendations. IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Stay and Compel Arbitration filed by defendants Ron Champagne, Mike Domingue, Andre Vizina, Brandon Vizina and R. Carson Vizina [Do c. 7] is GRANTED, and accordingly, all arbitrable claims asserted against the foregoing defendants shall be resolved through arbitration and the litigation between plaintiff and these defendants is stayed. The alternative Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 7] is DENIED. The defendants request for assessment of attorneys fees and costs is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Stay and Compel Arbitration [Doc. 58] filed by defendants Shaun Derise, Jake Huval, and Russell Knott is GRANTED, and accordingly, all arbitrable claims asserted against the foregoing defendants shall be resolved through arbitration and the litigation between plaintiff and these defendants is stayed. Signed by Judge Rebecca F Doherty on 11/14/12. (crt,Guidry, C)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
