Schexnider et al v. Schexnider et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|August 8, 2014
MEMORANDUM RULING re 39 MOTION for Summary Judgment. In light of the foregoing, plaintiffs claims asserted against the City of Kaplan are DISMISSED in their entirety, with prejudice. Signed by Judge Rebecca F Doherty on 8/8/14. (crt,Guidry, C)
|May 28, 2014
MEMORANDUM RULING: Currently pending before the Court is 25 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Keith Schexnider whereby defendant seeks dismissal of all claims brought against him by plaintiffs. For the following reasons, the motion is DENIED IN PART and DEFERRED IN PART. The motion is denied to the extent it seeks dismissal of plaintiffs' claims for invasion of privacy and intentional infliction of emotional distress; the motion is deferred to the extent it seeks dismissal of plaintiffs' claim of wrongful eviction. Signed by Judge Rebecca F Doherty on 5/27/2014. (crt,Putch, A)
|October 10, 2013
JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW: The undersigned has conducted a review of the pleadings and the record to determine whether the requirements for federal question jurisdiction are satisfied. In making that inquiry, the following chronology is pertinent. Accor dingly, the undersigned finds that the pleadings and other papers present claims arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States, over which claims the Court shall have original jurisdiction per 28 U.S.C. §1331. Per provisions of 28 U.S.C. §1367(a), the Court has supplemental jurisdiction over the related state law claims asserted in the pleadings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patrick J Hanna on 10/10/2013. (crt,Putch, A)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?